Lantern Hours

Carry the lantern. Open an entry. If two belong together, draw the thread.

Drawing a thread from . Choose another entry in the same season.

Map
Connection
Your threads
Thematic
Structural
Argumentative
Imagistic
Stylistic
Other

Index

Every entry, flat and in order. The same archive as the constellation, without the lantern.

Season I · chicago

01repository of misery

Your threads

The threads you have drawn between entries, with your names and margin notes. Nobody else sees them, and the author sets none. They are kept in this browser only.

Architecture

Lantern Hours is, in form, a personal blog. In function, it is Visual Cognitive Architecture (VCA): a structural record of my thinking as it develops, in which each piece is written in relation to the ones around it. Those relations aren't planned in advance but found on rereading, and each season closes with a reflection written in a mode that only the season itself made possible.

Outline

Lantern Hours functions as Visual Cognitive Architecture (VCA): an indirect simulacrum of my mind within the creative process (a broad definition) – though in this case, it provides structure to work that would otherwise be arbitrary (explained in length below). Each piece exists in deliberate or discoverable relation to the others, and contributes to an evolving body of work with its own internal logic.

Operational Terms

Nodes: individual entries. The basic unit of the archive. Connections: the direct connections between entries Threads: a communal essence/s (thematic, structural, argumentative, imagistic, stylistic, etc). Not declared in advance. Discovered by the the individual, and stays distinct to the individual. Clusters: seasons. Groups of entries with denser internal connection to each other than to entries outside the group. Meta-layer: the reflective essay at the end of each season. Positioned above the cluster it describes, examining the season’s connective structure rather than simply summarising its content.

Hermeneutic Movement

Each entry produced begins with an initial understanding (the horizon according to Gadamer), and upon completion of said entry, the ‘horizon’ will have broadened in the conceptual sense. Therefore, the next entry is written from a both a changed state and perspective – undergoing a form of recursive generation. On the topic of hermeneutics, each season will demonstrate the hermeneutic cycle in some form (more on seasons and threads later): one cannot fully comprehend the entire theme of the season without the input from each individual piece, but simultaneously cannot determine the entire input of a piece without referencing the collective season (other pieces).

Discrete Seasons

Every season is a self-contained narrative mode, with its own internal logic. The seasons themselves do not overlap in material, however it is the author (myself) that brings the output (and input) gained from the completion of the season into the next. A season begins when a creative ‘mode’ has been fully developed, established, inhabited and extinguished. More cogently, the conclusion of a season is entirely contingent on my arbitral decision (but typically when the creative mode has stopped producing discovery and started producing repetition. Often the reflection is where this realisation occurs).

Threads

Within a season, multiple threads between the entries will exist (for similar threads are what distinguishes one season from another) – whether this be thematic, tonal, imagistic, formal, structural, etc. However, I do not write consciously towards the threads, rather, they are something that occur naturally (though, patently, there will be a common ‘goal’ in mind for in the absence of one it becomes impossible to write entries that are connected in any way). Threads are recognised in the reflection and signal the conclusion of each season, the same way in which a reader notices patterns in a novel. A thread does not need one feature common to every entry within it. It holds together through overlapping similarities rather than a single shared essence. This is why a thread resists being reduced to a one-line summary within the reflection. Doing so would falsify how it works.

Reflections

The reflective essay at the end of a season is not a summary. It does not list the threads that ran through the season as naming them flatly would be both reductive and, across multiple seasons, repetitive. Instead, the reflection enacts what the season made possible: it is written in a mode that only became available because of what preceded it. The distance between what the season’s first entry could say and what the reflection can say is itself the evidence of what the season did. Threads will be explored in depth, using abstraction rather than a single summating sentence.

Occasionally a reflection may surface a specific question the season circled but didn’t resolve. If it appears, it appears in hindsight and it may or may not shape whatever comes next, without being referenced directly. This is not a mechanism I need to control or will be aiming to control. It is, at most, something I might notice much later, looking back across several seasons at once.

Medium Justification

The choice of a published blog (theoretically public but practically undiscovered) is deliberate, and it is in the liminality of this position that I find my purpose.

Even piece of writing intended only for oneself requires the discipline of a real, shareable language to remain meaningful. A private notation that is understood by no one else and unchecked by anything outside memory, risks becoming meaningless even to its author over time, as there is no way to confirm that a word means the same thing on its second use as it did on its first. Publication then, even unread, holds the writing to the standard of a public language. It requires the possibility of an audience, which is enough to keep the writing both honest and precise.

That liminal position is a third condition: demanding without being commercial / disciplined without being performative. The seasons compound this – each one a distinct phase of experimentation, and evolves in documented stages rather than pursuing one mode indefinitely.

You won't be able to create an account – your threads will remain connected to your browser. So no newsletter, no sign-ups. For now.

A Note on Use

This structure is to be used as a rough guide not as restriction. Everything is subject to change.

Grounding

Each concept describes something specific within Lantern Hours:

What each part of Lantern Hours is grounded in
Gadamerthe horizonhorizons broaden after completion of entries – the new entry is written from an expanded horizon, that was only made possible by the entry prior.
Schleiermacherthe hermeneutic circle/cycleyou can only understand an entry in relation to the rest of the season, and only understand a season in relation to constituent entries.
Kierkegaardstages and indirect communicationexplains why seasons are discrete rather than continuous, and why certain truths are shown through constructed experience rather than stated directly
Barthesdeath of the authorexplains the moment a piece produces something unplanned, and I become a reader of my own work rather than its author
Aristotlecontemplative lifegrounds why the project is justified on its own terms, independent of what it produces for anything else
Wittgensteinpicture theoryexplains why some of what a piece needs to convey can only be shown, not stated
Wittgensteinmeaning as useexplains why an entry's meaning depends on its position among the entries around it, not on the entry in isolation
Wittgensteinfamily resemblanceexplains how a thread holds together without one shared essential feature
Wittgensteinprivate languagegrounds why publication, even unread, disciplines the writing in a way private notation cannot
Tarskimeta-languageexplains the structural relationship between a season’s entries (object language) and its reflection (meta-language), which can say things about the season no entry within it could say about itself